Is humanizer safe to install?

No known risky patterns found. The scan covers prompt injection, hidden Unicode, remote code execution and credential access in every text file of the skill. It cannot judge intent, so read any flagged line in context before installing.

How was this score calculated?

Four checks of 25 points each: spec, efficiency, clarity and security. Findings take points off the check they belong to, and any critical finding caps the grade at F. The same scanner runs in your browser at proskills.dev/scan.

Is this report current?

It was made from commit 225a6f3 on 2026-10-16. If the skill has changed since, paste the new version into the scanner for a fresh score.

I wrote this skill. Can I fix the score or have the page removed?

Fix the findings and push. The reports are rebuilt from GitHub on a schedule, so the next run picks the change up. To have the page removed, open an issue on the ProSkills GitHub repo.

Scan reports · blader/humanizer

humanizer: scan report

Rewrite AI-sounding text so it reads like the writer without changing what it says. Use when editing or reviewing prose for AI tells: not-X-but-Y contrasts, one-line closers, staged openers, forced triads, dashes… An automated scan of this public skill from blader/humanizer: security, token cost, spec and clarity, with every finding and its fix.

Result

Verdict

humanizer

79/100 · grade C

blader/humanizer at 225a6f3

Spec 25 · Efficiency 13 · Clarity 16 · Security 25 (each out of 25)

Always loaded 88 tokens · on trigger 7,970 · on demand 8,096

eff/body-tokens warn · SKILL.md~7970 tokens load every time this triggers. Aim for under 5,000; split into reference files read on demand.
clarity/examples warn · SKILL.mdNo examples or code blocks. One concrete input → output example improves consistency more than extra rules.
clarity/vague info · SKILL.md6 vague phrases (you might, high-quality, high quality). Replace with concrete thresholds.
eff/orphan-file info · AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md is never mentioned in SKILL.md, so the agent won't know to read it.

Where it comes from

Source

Fact	Value
Repository	blader/humanizer
Skill folder	(repo root)
Stars	57,534
License	MIT
Commit scanned	225a6f3
Scanned	2026-10-16
Files	13

ProSkills doesn't host or redistribute this skill. Get it from its repository, and check the license before reusing it. Something wrong here? Open an issue for a rescan or removal.

For maintainers

Badge for the README

If you maintain this skill, this badge shows its score and links to this report. Fix findings and the score moves with the next scan.

[![ProSkills scan 79/100](https://proskills.dev/badge?score=79)](https://proskills.dev/reports/blader-humanizer)

Alternatives

Scanned alternatives on ProSkills

Skills in the ProSkills catalog that cover similar ground. Every one passes the same scanner before it ships.

FAQ

Questions

Is humanizer safe to install?: No known risky patterns found. The scan covers prompt injection, hidden Unicode, remote code execution and credential access in every text file of the skill. It cannot judge intent, so read any flagged line in context before installing.
How was this score calculated?: Four checks of 25 points each: spec, efficiency, clarity and security. Findings take points off the check they belong to, and any critical finding caps the grade at F. The same scanner runs in your browser at proskills.dev/scan.
Is this report current?: It was made from commit 225a6f3 on 2026-10-16. If the skill has changed since, paste the new version into the scanner for a fresh score.
I wrote this skill. Can I fix the score or have the page removed?: Fix the findings and push. The reports are rebuilt from GitHub on a schedule, so the next run picks the change up. To have the page removed, open an issue on the ProSkills GitHub repo.

Keep reading

Free tool

Scan your own skill

Paste a SKILL.md or drop a folder. It is scored in your browser and nothing is uploaded.

Open the Skill Scanner

Want a skill that already passes? Start with a free one.