Scan reports · Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
academic-paper-reviewer: scan report
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role… An automated scan of this public skill from Imbad0202/academic-research-skills: security, token cost, spec and clarity, with every finding and its fix.
Result
Verdict
25/100 · grade F
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills/academic-paper-reviewer at 060cb3c
Spec 0 · Efficiency 0 · Clarity 25 · Security 0 (each out of 25)
Always loaded 226 tokens · on trigger 10,847 · on demand 136,022
eff/body-tokenswarn · SKILL.md~10847 tokens load every time this triggers. Aim for under 5,000; split into reference files read on demand.sec/hidden-commentwarn · agents/devils_advocate_reviewer_agent.mdHTML comment carries instructions the user won't see rendered.sec/hidden-commentwarn · agents/domain_reviewer_agent.mdHTML comment carries instructions the user won't see rendered.sec/hidden-commentwarn · agents/editorial_synthesizer_agent.mdHTML comment carries instructions the user won't see rendered.sec/hidden-commentwarn · agents/eic_agent.mdHTML comment carries instructions the user won't see rendered.sec/hidden-commentwarn · agents/field_analyst_agent.mdHTML comment carries instructions the user won't see rendered.sec/hidden-commentwarn · agents/methodology_reviewer_agent.mdHTML comment carries instructions the user won't see rendered.sec/hidden-commentwarn · agents/perspective_reviewer_agent.mdHTML comment carries instructions the user won't see rendered.sec/hidden-commentwarn · references/reviewer_sprint_prompt_source.mdHTML comment carries instructions the user won't see rendered.sec/hidden-commentwarn · SKILL.mdHTML comment carries instructions the user won't see rendered.eff/body-lineswarn · SKILL.mdSKILL.md body is 526 lines; keep it under 500 and move detail into reference files.eff/description-triggerwarn · SKILL.mddescription doesn't say *when* to use the skill ("Use when …"). Agents decide from this line alone.sec/prompt-injectionwarn · agents/devils_advocate_reviewer_agent.md:109Tries to override the agent's instructions. Reads as an example or a warning here; check it in context.sec/prompt-injectionwarn · agents/domain_reviewer_agent.md:108Tries to override the agent's instructions. Reads as an example or a warning here; check it in context.sec/prompt-injectionwarn · agents/eic_agent.md:107Tries to override the agent's instructions. Reads as an example or a warning here; check it in context.sec/prompt-injectionwarn · agents/methodology_reviewer_agent.md:104Tries to override the agent's instructions. Reads as an example or a warning here; check it in context.sec/prompt-injectionwarn · agents/perspective_reviewer_agent.md:108Tries to override the agent's instructions. Reads as an example or a warning here; check it in context.sec/prompt-injectionwarn · references/reviewer_sprint_prompt_source.md:115Tries to override the agent's instructions. Reads as an example or a warning here; check it in context.spec/broken-refwarn · SKILL.md:24References .claude/CLAUDE.md, which isn't in the skill folder.spec/broken-refwarn · SKILL.md:24References shared/references/routing_core.md, which isn't in the skill folder.spec/broken-refwarn · SKILL.md:36References shared/references/intent_clarification_protocol.md, which isn't in the skill folder.spec/broken-refwarn · SKILL.md:113References shared/mode_spectrum.md, which isn't in the skill folder.spec/broken-refwarn · SKILL.md:438References templates/peer_review_report_template.md, which isn't in the skill folder.spec/broken-refwarn · SKILL.md:439References templates/editorial_decision_template.md, which isn't in the skill folder.spec/broken-refwarn · SKILL.md:440References templates/revision_response_template.md, which isn't in the skill folder.eff/orphan-fileinfo · examples/subclaim_decomposition_example.mdexamples/subclaim_decomposition_example.md is never mentioned in SKILL.md, so the agent won't know to read it.
Where it comes from
Source
| Fact | Value |
|---|---|
| Repository | Imbad0202/academic-research-skills |
| Skill folder | academic-paper-reviewer |
| Stars | 52,394 |
| License | None stated |
| Commit scanned | 060cb3c |
| Scanned | 2026-10-16 |
| Files | 25 |
ProSkills doesn't host or redistribute this skill. Get it from its repository, and check the license before reusing it. Something wrong here? Open an issue for a rescan or removal.
For maintainers
Badge for the README
If you maintain this skill, this badge shows its score and links to this report. Fix findings and the score moves with the next scan.
[](https://proskills.dev/reports/imbad0202-academic-paper-reviewer)
Alternatives
Scanned alternatives on ProSkills
Skills in the ProSkills catalog that cover similar ground. Every one passes the same scanner before it ships.
- PR ReviewerStaff-level review. Every finding labelled, with a line.Loads when the user asks for a code review or whether a change is safe to merge.5 rules · Code ReviewScan 100$12
- Debug DetectiveRoot cause, not a patch. Regression test included.Loads when the user has a failing test, an error or a bug that regressed.5 rules · Code ReviewScan 100$9
Same repository
More from Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
FAQ
Questions
- Is academic-paper-reviewer safe to install?
- No critical findings, some security notes. The scan covers prompt injection, hidden Unicode, remote code execution and credential access in every text file of the skill. It cannot judge intent, so read any flagged line in context before installing.
- How was this score calculated?
- Four checks of 25 points each: spec, efficiency, clarity and security. Findings take points off the check they belong to, and any critical finding caps the grade at F. The same scanner runs in your browser at proskills.dev/scan.
- Is this report current?
- It was made from commit 060cb3c on 2026-10-16. If the skill has changed since, paste the new version into the scanner for a fresh score.
- I wrote this skill. Can I fix the score or have the page removed?
- Fix the findings and push. The reports are rebuilt from GitHub on a schedule, so the next run picks the change up. To have the page removed, open an issue on the ProSkills GitHub repo.
Related
Keep reading
Free tool
Scan your own skill
Paste a SKILL.md or drop a folder. It is scored in your browser and nothing is uploaded.
Want a skill that already passes? Start with a free one.