ProSkillsLibraryFreePassScan

Scan reports · mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

analyzing-campaign-attribution-evidence: scan report

Systematically evaluate cyber-campaign evidence to attribute an operation to a threat actor, using the Diamond Model and Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) to weigh infrastructure overlaps, TTP consistency, malware… An automated scan of this public skill from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills: security, token cost, spec and clarity, with every finding and its fix.

Result

Verdict

analyzing-campaign-attribution-evidence

83/100 · grade B

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/skills/analyzing-campaign-attribution-evidence at 54a7988

Spec 21 · Efficiency 17 · Clarity 25 · Security 20 (each out of 25)

Always loaded 110 tokens · on trigger 2,107 · on demand 5,736

  • sec/undocumented-script warn · SKILL.mdBundles scripts that SKILL.md never explains. Say what each script does and when it runs.
  • spec/non-portable-keys warn · SKILL.mdNon-spec frontmatter (domain, subdomain, tags, version, author, nist_csf, mitre_attack). claude.ai and the Skills API reject the upload; move them under `metadata` or drop them.
  • eff/orphan-file info · assets/template.mdassets/template.md is never mentioned in SKILL.md, so the agent won't know to read it.
  • eff/orphan-file info · references/api-reference.mdreferences/api-reference.md is never mentioned in SKILL.md, so the agent won't know to read it.
  • eff/orphan-file info · references/standards.mdreferences/standards.md is never mentioned in SKILL.md, so the agent won't know to read it.
  • eff/orphan-file info · references/workflows.mdreferences/workflows.md is never mentioned in SKILL.md, so the agent won't know to read it.

Where it comes from

Source

FactValue
Repositorymukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
Skill folderskills/analyzing-campaign-attribution-evidence
Stars34,556
LicenseApache-2.0
Commit scanned54a7988
Scanned2026-10-16
Files7

ProSkills doesn't host or redistribute this skill. Get it from its repository, and check the license before reusing it. Something wrong here? Open an issue for a rescan or removal.

For maintainers

Badge for the README

If you maintain this skill, this badge shows its score and links to this report. Fix findings and the score moves with the next scan.

[![ProSkills scan 83/100](https://proskills.dev/badge?score=83)](https://proskills.dev/reports/mukul975-analyzing-campaign-attribution-evidence)

Alternatives

Scanned alternatives on ProSkills

Skills in the ProSkills catalog that cover similar ground. Every one passes the same scanner before it ships.

Same repository

More from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

FAQ

Questions

Is analyzing-campaign-attribution-evidence safe to install?
No critical findings, some security notes. The scan covers prompt injection, hidden Unicode, remote code execution and credential access in every text file of the skill. It cannot judge intent, so read any flagged line in context before installing.
How was this score calculated?
Four checks of 25 points each: spec, efficiency, clarity and security. Findings take points off the check they belong to, and any critical finding caps the grade at F. The same scanner runs in your browser at proskills.dev/scan.
Is this report current?
It was made from commit 54a7988 on 2026-10-16. If the skill has changed since, paste the new version into the scanner for a fresh score.
I wrote this skill. Can I fix the score or have the page removed?
Fix the findings and push. The reports are rebuilt from GitHub on a schedule, so the next run picks the change up. To have the page removed, open an issue on the ProSkills GitHub repo.

Related

Keep reading

Free tool

Scan your own skill

Paste a SKILL.md or drop a folder. It is scored in your browser and nothing is uploaded.

Want a skill that already passes? Start with a free one.