Is planning-with-files safe to install?

No known risky patterns found. The scan covers prompt injection, hidden Unicode, remote code execution and credential access in every text file of the skill. It cannot judge intent, so read any flagged line in context before installing.

How was this score calculated?

Four checks of 25 points each: spec, efficiency, clarity and security. Findings take points off the check they belong to, and any critical finding caps the grade at F. The same scanner runs in your browser at proskills.dev/scan.

Is this report current?

It was made from commit 6b30f32 on 2026-10-16. If the skill has changed since, paste the new version into the scanner for a fresh score.

I wrote this skill. Can I fix the score or have the page removed?

Fix the findings and push. The reports are rebuilt from GitHub on a schedule, so the next run picks the change up. To have the page removed, open an issue on the ProSkills GitHub repo.

Scan reports · OthmanAdi/planning-with-files

planning-with-files: scan report

Persistent file-based planning for multi-step AI-agent work. Keeps task_plan.md, findings.md, and progress.md on disk; Gemini lifecycle hooks inject selected project planning context. Automatic recovery reads project… An automated scan of this public skill from OthmanAdi/planning-with-files: security, token cost, spec and clarity, with every finding and its fix.

Verdict

No known risky patterns found

Nothing in the skill matched the scanner's security rules: no instruction overrides, hidden characters, remote code or credential access.

planning-with-filesScan 66/100Grade D

OthmanAdi/planning-with-files/.gemini/skills/planning-with-files at 6b30f32

Spec 1 · Efficiency 19 · Clarity 21 · Security 25 (each out of 25)

Always loaded 156 tokens · on trigger 2,747 · on demand 55,650

spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:17References task_plan.md, which isn't in the skill folder.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:17References task_plan.md, which isn't in the skill folder.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:17References progress.md, which isn't in the skill folder.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:17References findings.md, which isn't in the skill folder.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:223References .gemini/settings.json, which isn't in the skill folder.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:239References findings.md, which isn't in the skill folder.
clarity/output warn · SKILL.mdDoesn't say what the result should look like. Add an Output section.
eff/orphan-file info · templates/analytics_findings.mdtemplates/analytics_findings.md is never mentioned in SKILL.md, so the agent won't know to read it.
eff/orphan-file info · templates/analytics_task_plan.mdtemplates/analytics_task_plan.md is never mentioned in SKILL.md, so the agent won't know to read it.
eff/orphan-file info · templates/loop.mdtemplates/loop.md is never mentioned in SKILL.md, so the agent won't know to read it.

Source

Fact	Value
Repository	OthmanAdi/planning-with-files
Skill folder	.gemini/skills/planning-with-files
Stars	27,477
License	MIT
Commit scanned	6b30f32
Scanned	2026-10-16
Files	21

ProSkills doesn't host or redistribute this skill. Get it from its repository, and check the license before reusing it. Something wrong here? Open an issue for a rescan or removal.

Badge for the README

If you maintain this skill, this badge shows its score and links to this report. Fix findings and the score moves with the next scan.

[![ProSkills scan 66/100](https://proskills.dev/badge?score=66)](https://proskills.dev/reports/othmanadi-planning-with-files-planning-with-files-6)

Scanned alternatives on ProSkills

Skills in the ProSkills catalog that cover similar ground. Every one passes the same scanner before it ships.

More from OthmanAdi/planning-with-files

Skill	Scan	Grade
planning-with-files	64/100	D
planning-with-files	62/100	D
planning-with-files	74/100	C
planning-with-files	76/100	C
planning-with-files	74/100	C
planning-with-files	74/100	C
planning-with-files	68/100	D
planning-with-files	64/100	D
planning-with-files	80/100	B
planning-with-files	74/100	C
planning-with-files-ar	86/100	B
planning-with-files-de	86/100	B

Questions

Is planning-with-files safe to install?: No known risky patterns found. The scan covers prompt injection, hidden Unicode, remote code execution and credential access in every text file of the skill. It cannot judge intent, so read any flagged line in context before installing.
How was this score calculated?: Four checks of 25 points each: spec, efficiency, clarity and security. Findings take points off the check they belong to, and any critical finding caps the grade at F. The same scanner runs in your browser at proskills.dev/scan.
Is this report current?: It was made from commit 6b30f32 on 2026-10-16. If the skill has changed since, paste the new version into the scanner for a fresh score.
I wrote this skill. Can I fix the score or have the page removed?: Fix the findings and push. The reports are rebuilt from GitHub on a schedule, so the next run picks the change up. To have the page removed, open an issue on the ProSkills GitHub repo.

Keep reading

Scan your own skill

Paste a SKILL.md or drop a folder. It is scored in your browser and nothing is uploaded.

Open the Skill Scanner

Want a skill that already passes? Start with a free one.