Is review-storybook safe to install?

No known risky patterns found. The scan covers prompt injection, hidden Unicode, remote code execution and credential access in every text file of the skill. It cannot judge intent, so read any flagged line in context before installing.

How was this score calculated?

Four checks of 25 points each: spec, efficiency, clarity and security. Findings take points off the check they belong to, and any critical finding caps the grade at F. The same scanner runs in your browser at proskills.dev/scan.

Is this report current?

It was made from commit 2cc7992 on 2026-10-16. If the skill has changed since, paste the new version into the scanner for a fresh score.

I wrote this skill. Can I fix the score or have the page removed?

Fix the findings and push. The reports are rebuilt from GitHub on a schedule, so the next run picks the change up. To have the page removed, open an issue on the ProSkills GitHub repo.

Scan reports · paperclipai/paperclip

review-storybook: scan report

Review Paperclip stories for a feature or change using the Storybook catalog, production source, and existing browser tests. Report component, mock, interaction, and visual evidence separately. An automated scan of this public skill from paperclipai/paperclip: security, token cost, spec and clarity, with every finding and its fix.

Verdict

No known risky patterns found

Nothing in the skill matched the scanner's security rules: no instruction overrides, hidden characters, remote code or credential access.

review-storybookScan 77/100Grade C

paperclipai/paperclip/.agents/skills/review-storybook at 2cc7992

Spec 21 · Efficiency 19 · Clarity 12 · Security 25 (each out of 25)

Always loaded 53 tokens · on trigger 784 · on demand 30

eff/description-trigger warn · SKILL.mddescription doesn't say *when* to use the skill ("Use when …"). Agents decide from this line alone.
clarity/structure warn · SKILL.mdFew headings; break the body into sections (workflow, rules, output).
clarity/examples warn · SKILL.mdNo examples or code blocks. One concrete input → output example improves consistency more than extra rules.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:8References ../../../maps/storybook-map/README.md, which isn't in the skill folder.
clarity/workflow info · SKILL.mdNo numbered workflow. Ordered steps make agents more reliable than prose.

Source

Fact	Value
Repository	paperclipai/paperclip
Skill folder	.agents/skills/review-storybook
Stars	103,099
License	MIT
Commit scanned	2cc7992
Scanned	2026-10-16
Files	2

ProSkills doesn't host or redistribute this skill. Get it from its repository, and check the license before reusing it. Something wrong here? Open an issue for a rescan or removal.

Badge for the README

If you maintain this skill, this badge shows its score and links to this report. Fix findings and the score moves with the next scan.

[![ProSkills scan 77/100](https://proskills.dev/badge?score=77)](https://proskills.dev/reports/paperclipai-review-storybook)

Scanned alternatives on ProSkills

Skills in the ProSkills catalog that cover similar ground. Every one passes the same scanner before it ships.

More from paperclipai/paperclip

Skill	Scan	Grade
add-product-e2e-eval	78/100	C
add-runner-eval	86/100	B
check-pr	93/100	A
company-creator	96/100	A
create-agent-adapter	80/100	B
create-external-bot-integration	95/100	A
create-issue-interaction-ui	97/100	A
create-paperclip-bundled-skill	84/100	B
create-verification-skill	81/100	B
deal-with-security-advisory	100/100	A
delegate-work	83/100	B
design-guide	96/100	A

Questions

Is review-storybook safe to install?: No known risky patterns found. The scan covers prompt injection, hidden Unicode, remote code execution and credential access in every text file of the skill. It cannot judge intent, so read any flagged line in context before installing.
How was this score calculated?: Four checks of 25 points each: spec, efficiency, clarity and security. Findings take points off the check they belong to, and any critical finding caps the grade at F. The same scanner runs in your browser at proskills.dev/scan.
Is this report current?: It was made from commit 2cc7992 on 2026-10-16. If the skill has changed since, paste the new version into the scanner for a fresh score.
I wrote this skill. Can I fix the score or have the page removed?: Fix the findings and push. The reports are rebuilt from GitHub on a schedule, so the next run picks the change up. To have the page removed, open an issue on the ProSkills GitHub repo.

Keep reading

Scan your own skill

Paste a SKILL.md or drop a folder. It is scored in your browser and nothing is uploaded.

Open the Skill Scanner

Want a skill that already passes? Start with a free one.