Is review-architecture safe to install?

No known risky patterns found. The scan covers prompt injection, hidden Unicode, remote code execution and credential access in every text file of the skill. It cannot judge intent, so read any flagged line in context before installing.

How was this score calculated?

Four checks of 25 points each: spec, efficiency, clarity and security. Findings take points off the check they belong to, and any critical finding caps the grade at F. The same scanner runs in your browser at proskills.dev/scan.

Is this report current?

It was made from commit 599727d on 2026-10-19. If the skill has changed since, paste the new version into the scanner for a fresh score.

I wrote this skill. Can I fix the score or have the page removed?

Fix the findings and push. The reports are rebuilt from GitHub on a schedule, so the next run picks the change up. To have the page removed, open an issue on the ProSkills GitHub repo.

Scan reports · pascalorg/editor

review-architecture: scan report

Review a PR against the Pascal architectural rules — package boundaries (core/viewer/editor/nodes), the registry-driven composition model (def.geometry / def.renderer / def.system), legacy-dispatch regressions, the… An automated scan of this public skill from pascalorg/editor: security, token cost, spec and clarity, with every finding and its fix.

Result

Verdict

review-architecture

66/100 · grade D

pascalorg/editor/.agents/skills/review-architecture at 599727d

Spec 0 · Efficiency 16 · Clarity 25 · Security 25 (each out of 25)

Always loaded 120 tokens · on trigger 7,393 · on demand 0

eff/body-tokens warn · SKILL.md~7393 tokens load every time this triggers. Aim for under 5,000; split into reference files read on demand.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:22References wiki/architecture/agent-surfaces.md, which isn't in the skill folder.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:30References wiki/architecture/inspector-field-limits.md, which isn't in the skill folder.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:32References wiki/architecture/interaction-scope.md, which isn't in the skill folder.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:32References lib/snapping-mode.ts, which isn't in the skill folder.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:34References DECISIONS.md, which isn't in the skill folder.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:34References wiki/architecture/node-definitions.md, which isn't in the skill folder.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:107References wiki/architecture/node-definitions.md, which isn't in the skill folder.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:108References packages/core/src/registry/types.ts, which isn't in the skill folder.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:135References wiki/architecture/tools.md, which isn't in the skill folder.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:141References wiki/architecture/layers.md, which isn't in the skill folder.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:153References interaction-scope.md, which isn't in the skill folder.

Where it comes from

Source

Fact	Value
Repository	pascalorg/editor
Skill folder	.agents/skills/review-architecture
Stars	24,976
License	MIT
Commit scanned	599727d
Scanned	2026-10-19
Files	1

ProSkills doesn't host or redistribute this skill. Get it from its repository, and check the license before reusing it. Something wrong here? Open an issue for a rescan or removal.

For maintainers

Badge for the README

If you maintain this skill, this badge shows its score and links to this report. Fix findings and the score moves with the next scan.

[![ProSkills scan 66/100](https://proskills.dev/badge?score=66)](https://proskills.dev/reports/pascalorg-review-architecture)

Alternatives

Scanned alternatives on ProSkills

Skills in the ProSkills catalog that cover similar ground. Every one passes the same scanner before it ships.

Same repository

More from pascalorg/editor

FAQ

Questions

Is review-architecture safe to install?: No known risky patterns found. The scan covers prompt injection, hidden Unicode, remote code execution and credential access in every text file of the skill. It cannot judge intent, so read any flagged line in context before installing.
How was this score calculated?: Four checks of 25 points each: spec, efficiency, clarity and security. Findings take points off the check they belong to, and any critical finding caps the grade at F. The same scanner runs in your browser at proskills.dev/scan.
Is this report current?: It was made from commit 599727d on 2026-10-19. If the skill has changed since, paste the new version into the scanner for a fresh score.
I wrote this skill. Can I fix the score or have the page removed?: Fix the findings and push. The reports are rebuilt from GitHub on a schedule, so the next run picks the change up. To have the page removed, open an issue on the ProSkills GitHub repo.

Keep reading

Free tool

Scan your own skill

Paste a SKILL.md or drop a folder. It is scored in your browser and nothing is uploaded.

Open the Skill Scanner

Want a skill that already passes? Start with a free one.