Scan reports · phuryn/pm-skills
intended-vs-implemented: scan report
The method for finding the gap between what a system is supposed to do and what the code actually does — the class of bug generic scanners miss because they have no model of intent. Defines what counts as documented… An automated scan of this public skill from phuryn/pm-skills: security, token cost, spec and clarity, with every finding and its fix.
Verdict
phuryn/pm-skills/pm-ai-shipping/skills/intended-vs-implemented at 07b34f6
Spec 25 · Efficiency 25 · Clarity 16 · Security 25 (each out of 25)
Always loaded 126 tokens · on trigger 855 · on demand 0
clarity/exampleswarn · SKILL.mdNo examples or code blocks. One concrete input → output example improves consistency more than extra rules.clarity/outputwarn · SKILL.mdDoesn't say what the result should look like. Add an Output section.
Source
| Fact | Value |
|---|---|
| Repository | phuryn/pm-skills |
| Skill folder | pm-ai-shipping/skills/intended-vs-implemented |
| Stars | 27,113 |
| License | MIT |
| Commit scanned | 07b34f6 |
| Scanned | 2026-10-16 |
| Files | 1 |
ProSkills doesn't host or redistribute this skill. Get it from its repository, and check the license before reusing it. Something wrong here? Open an issue for a rescan or removal.
Badge for the README
If you maintain this skill, this badge shows its score and links to this report. Fix findings and the score moves with the next scan.
[](https://proskills.dev/reports/phuryn-intended-vs-implemented)
Scanned alternatives on ProSkills
Skills in the ProSkills catalog that cover similar ground. Every one passes the same scanner before it ships.
- PR Reviewer$12Scan 100/1005 rules · Code ReviewStaff-level review. Every finding labelled, with a line.Loads when the user asks for a code review or whether a change is safe to merge.
- Refactor Surgeon$9Scan 100/1005 rules · Code ReviewBehaviour-preserving refactors in small steps.Loads when the user wants code restructured without changing what it does.
More from phuryn/pm-skills
| Skill | Scan | Grade |
|---|---|---|
| ab-test-analysis | 96/100 | A |
| beachhead-segment | 92/100 | A |
| brainstorm-okrs | 100/100 | A |
| code-review | 100/100 | A |
| cohort-analysis | 100/100 | A |
| competitive-battlecard | 100/100 | A |
| competitor-analysis | 93/100 | A |
| create-prd | 95/100 | A |
| customer-journey-map | 96/100 | A |
| dummy-dataset | 100/100 | A |
| growth-loops | 92/100 | A |
| gtm-motions | 92/100 | A |
Questions
- Is intended-vs-implemented safe to install?
- No known risky patterns found. The scan covers prompt injection, hidden Unicode, remote code execution and credential access in every text file of the skill. It cannot judge intent, so read any flagged line in context before installing.
- How was this score calculated?
- Four checks of 25 points each: spec, efficiency, clarity and security. Findings take points off the check they belong to, and any critical finding caps the grade at F. The same scanner runs in your browser at proskills.dev/scan.
- Is this report current?
- It was made from commit 07b34f6 on 2026-10-16. If the skill has changed since, paste the new version into the scanner for a fresh score.
- I wrote this skill. Can I fix the score or have the page removed?
- Fix the findings and push. The reports are rebuilt from GitHub on a schedule, so the next run picks the change up. To have the page removed, open an issue on the ProSkills GitHub repo.
Keep reading
Paste a SKILL.md or drop a folder. It is scored in your browser and nothing is uploaded.
Want a skill that already passes? Start with a free one.