Is archify safe to install?

No critical findings, some security notes. The scan covers prompt injection, hidden Unicode, remote code execution and credential access in every text file of the skill. It cannot judge intent, so read any flagged line in context before installing.

How was this score calculated?

Four checks of 25 points each: spec, efficiency, clarity and security. Findings take points off the check they belong to, and any critical finding caps the grade at F. The same scanner runs in your browser at proskills.dev/scan.

Is this report current?

It was made from commit ca67c9f on 2026-10-16. If the skill has changed since, paste the new version into the scanner for a fresh score.

I wrote this skill. Can I fix the score or have the page removed?

Fix the findings and push. The reports are rebuilt from GitHub on a schedule, so the next run picks the change up. To have the page removed, open an issue on the ProSkills GitHub repo.

Scan reports · tt-a1i/archify

archify: scan report

Create validated architecture, workflow, sequence, data-flow, lifecycle/state, entity-relationship, class/interface, tree, timeline, and execution waterfall diagrams as explorable standalone HTML with inline SVG,… An automated scan of this public skill from tt-a1i/archify: security, token cost, spec and clarity, with every finding and its fix.

Result

Verdict

archify

49/100 · grade F

tt-a1i/archify/archify at ca67c9f

Spec 1 · Efficiency 23 · Clarity 25 · Security 0 (each out of 25)

Always loaded 213 tokens · on trigger 3,697 · on demand 564,046

sec/hidden-comment warn · assets/template.htmlHTML comment carries instructions the user won't see rendered.
sec/persistence warn · bin/archify.mjs:4971Installs persistence or edits shell/agent config.
sec/persistence warn · bin/finalize.mjs:128Installs persistence or edits shell/agent config.
sec/hidden-comment warn · examples/class-payment-processors-rendered.htmlHTML comment carries instructions the user won't see rendered.
sec/obfuscation warn · assets/template.html:146Long encoded blob; reviewers can't read what it does.
sec/obfuscation warn · examples/class-payment-processors-rendered.html:146Long encoded blob; reviewers can't read what it does.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:16References references/repository-authoring.md, which isn't in the skill folder.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:41References references/architecture-layout-repair.md, which isn't in the skill folder.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:41References references/authoring-contract.md, which isn't in the skill folder.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:91References references/delivery-contract.md, which isn't in the skill folder.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:101References references/viewer-runtime.md, which isn't in the skill folder.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:112References references/delivery-contract.md, which isn't in the skill folder.
eff/orphan-file info · THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES.mdTHIRD_PARTY_NOTICES.md is never mentioned in SKILL.md, so the agent won't know to read it.
sec/plain-http info · SKILL.mdLinks over plain http.

Where it comes from

Source

Fact	Value
Repository	tt-a1i/archify
Skill folder	archify
Stars	84,429
License	MIT
Commit scanned	ca67c9f
Scanned	2026-10-16
Files	25

ProSkills doesn't host or redistribute this skill. Get it from its repository, and check the license before reusing it. Something wrong here? Open an issue for a rescan or removal.

For maintainers

Badge for the README

If you maintain this skill, this badge shows its score and links to this report. Fix findings and the score moves with the next scan.

[![ProSkills scan 49/100](https://proskills.dev/badge?score=49)](https://proskills.dev/reports/tt-a1i-archify)

Alternatives

Scanned alternatives on ProSkills

Skills in the ProSkills catalog that cover similar ground. Every one passes the same scanner before it ships.

Same repository

More from tt-a1i/archify

FAQ

Questions

Is archify safe to install?: No critical findings, some security notes. The scan covers prompt injection, hidden Unicode, remote code execution and credential access in every text file of the skill. It cannot judge intent, so read any flagged line in context before installing.
How was this score calculated?: Four checks of 25 points each: spec, efficiency, clarity and security. Findings take points off the check they belong to, and any critical finding caps the grade at F. The same scanner runs in your browser at proskills.dev/scan.
Is this report current?: It was made from commit ca67c9f on 2026-10-16. If the skill has changed since, paste the new version into the scanner for a fresh score.
I wrote this skill. Can I fix the score or have the page removed?: Fix the findings and push. The reports are rebuilt from GitHub on a schedule, so the next run picks the change up. To have the page removed, open an issue on the ProSkills GitHub repo.

Keep reading

Free tool

Scan your own skill

Paste a SKILL.md or drop a folder. It is scored in your browser and nothing is uploaded.

Open the Skill Scanner

Want a skill that already passes? Start with a free one.