Is auto-review-loop safe to install?

No known risky patterns found. The scan covers prompt injection, hidden Unicode, remote code execution and credential access in every text file of the skill. It cannot judge intent, so read any flagged line in context before installing.

How was this score calculated?

Four checks of 25 points each: spec, efficiency, clarity and security. Findings take points off the check they belong to, and any critical finding caps the grade at F. The same scanner runs in your browser at proskills.dev/scan.

Is this report current?

It was made from commit 43a5daf on 2026-10-19. If the skill has changed since, paste the new version into the scanner for a fresh score.

I wrote this skill. Can I fix the score or have the page removed?

Fix the findings and push. The reports are rebuilt from GitHub on a schedule, so the next run picks the change up. To have the page removed, open an issue on the ProSkills GitHub repo.

Scan reports · wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep

auto-review-loop: scan report

Autonomous multi-round research review loop. In Copilot CLI it defaults to the native complementary rubber-duck subagent with host-event model evidence; elsewhere it uses Codex, while explicit external reviewer… An automated scan of this public skill from wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep: security, token cost, spec and clarity, with every finding and its fix.

Result

Verdict

auto-review-loop

50/100 · grade F

wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/skills/auto-review-loop at 43a5daf

Spec 0 · Efficiency 0 · Clarity 25 · Security 25 (each out of 25)

Always loaded 90 tokens · on trigger 18,582 · on demand 0

eff/body-tokens warn · SKILL.md~18582 tokens load every time this triggers. Aim for under 5,000; split into reference files read on demand.
eff/body-lines warn · SKILL.mdSKILL.md body is 1206 lines; keep it under 500 and move detail into reference files.
eff/description-trigger warn · SKILL.mddescription doesn't say *when* to use the skill ("Use when …"). Agents decide from this line alone.
spec/non-portable-keys warn · SKILL.mdNon-spec frontmatter (argument-hint). claude.ai and the Skills API reject the upload; move them under `metadata` or drop them.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:29References shared-references/reviewer-routing.md, which isn't in the skill folder.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:32References EXPERIMENT_LOG.md, which isn't in the skill folder.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:32References findings.md, which isn't in the skill folder.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:32References findings.md, which isn't in the skill folder.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:64References reviewer-backends.md, which isn't in the skill folder.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:141References shared-references/reviewer-routing.md, which isn't in the skill folder.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:266References review-stage/AUTO_REVIEW.md, which isn't in the skill folder.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:266References AUTO_REVIEW.md, which isn't in the skill folder.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:271References findings.md, which isn't in the skill folder.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:271References EXPERIMENT_LOG.md, which isn't in the skill folder.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:271References review-stage/AUTO_REVIEW.md, which isn't in the skill folder.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:385References shared-references/reviewer-routing.md, which isn't in the skill folder.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:627References shared-references/review-tracing.md, which isn't in the skill folder.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:1031References reviewer-routing.md, which isn't in the skill folder.
spec/broken-ref warn · SKILL.md:1031References ../shared-references/reviewer-routing.md, which isn't in the skill folder.

Where it comes from

Source

Fact	Value
Repository	wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep
Skill folder	skills/auto-review-loop
Stars	17,701
License	MIT
Commit scanned	43a5daf
Scanned	2026-10-19
Files	1

ProSkills doesn't host or redistribute this skill. Get it from its repository, and check the license before reusing it. Something wrong here? Open an issue for a rescan or removal.

For maintainers

Badge for the README

If you maintain this skill, this badge shows its score and links to this report. Fix findings and the score moves with the next scan.

[![ProSkills scan 50/100](https://proskills.dev/badge?score=50)](https://proskills.dev/reports/wanshuiyin-auto-review-loop)

Alternatives

Scanned alternatives on ProSkills

Skills in the ProSkills catalog that cover similar ground. Every one passes the same scanner before it ships.

Same repository

More from wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep

FAQ

Questions

Is auto-review-loop safe to install?: No known risky patterns found. The scan covers prompt injection, hidden Unicode, remote code execution and credential access in every text file of the skill. It cannot judge intent, so read any flagged line in context before installing.
How was this score calculated?: Four checks of 25 points each: spec, efficiency, clarity and security. Findings take points off the check they belong to, and any critical finding caps the grade at F. The same scanner runs in your browser at proskills.dev/scan.
Is this report current?: It was made from commit 43a5daf on 2026-10-19. If the skill has changed since, paste the new version into the scanner for a fresh score.
I wrote this skill. Can I fix the score or have the page removed?: Fix the findings and push. The reports are rebuilt from GitHub on a schedule, so the next run picks the change up. To have the page removed, open an issue on the ProSkills GitHub repo.

Keep reading

Free tool

Scan your own skill

Paste a SKILL.md or drop a folder. It is scored in your browser and nothing is uploaded.

Open the Skill Scanner

Want a skill that already passes? Start with a free one.