Is analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection safe to install?

No critical findings, some security notes. The scan covers prompt injection, hidden Unicode, remote code execution and credential access in every text file of the skill. It cannot judge intent, so read any flagged line in context before installing.

How was this score calculated?

Four checks of 25 points each: spec, efficiency, clarity and security. Findings take points off the check they belong to, and any critical finding caps the grade at F. The same scanner runs in your browser at proskills.dev/scan.

Is this report current?

It was made from commit 54a7988 on 2026-10-16. If the skill has changed since, paste the new version into the scanner for a fresh score.

I wrote this skill. Can I fix the score or have the page removed?

Fix the findings and push. The reports are rebuilt from GitHub on a schedule, so the next run picks the change up. To have the page removed, open an issue on the ProSkills GitHub repo.

Scan reports · mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection: scan report

Runtime iOS app security testing with Objection (Frida): inspect keychain and filesystem data, explore app internals at runtime, and validate/bypass client-side protections during authorized mobile assessments. An automated scan of this public skill from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills: security, token cost, spec and clarity, with every finding and its fix.

Result

Verdict

analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection

57/100 · grade F

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/skills/analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection at 54a7988

Spec 21 · Efficiency 11 · Clarity 25 · Security 0 (each out of 25)

Always loaded 63 tokens · on trigger 1,460 · on demand 7,740

sec/secret-read warn · assets/template.md:20Touches credential files.
sec/secret-read warn · references/api-reference.md:12Touches credential files.
sec/secret-read warn · references/standards.md:7Touches credential files.
sec/secret-read warn · references/workflows.md:37Touches credential files.
sec/secret-read warn · scripts/agent.py:5Touches credential files.
sec/secret-read warn · scripts/process.py:6Touches credential files.
sec/secret-read warn · SKILL.md:4Touches credential files.
eff/description-trigger warn · SKILL.mddescription doesn't say *when* to use the skill ("Use when …"). Agents decide from this line alone.
spec/non-portable-keys warn · SKILL.mdNon-spec frontmatter (domain, subdomain, author, tags, version, atlas_techniques, nist_ai_rmf, nist_csf, mitre_attack). claude.ai and the Skills API reject the upload; move them under `metadata` or drop them.
eff/orphan-file info · assets/template.mdassets/template.md is never mentioned in SKILL.md, so the agent won't know to read it.
eff/orphan-file info · references/api-reference.mdreferences/api-reference.md is never mentioned in SKILL.md, so the agent won't know to read it.
eff/orphan-file info · references/standards.mdreferences/standards.md is never mentioned in SKILL.md, so the agent won't know to read it.
eff/orphan-file info · references/workflows.mdreferences/workflows.md is never mentioned in SKILL.md, so the agent won't know to read it.

Where it comes from

Source

Fact	Value
Repository	mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
Skill folder	skills/analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection
Stars	34,556
License	Apache-2.0
Commit scanned	54a7988
Scanned	2026-10-16
Files	7

ProSkills doesn't host or redistribute this skill. Get it from its repository, and check the license before reusing it. Something wrong here? Open an issue for a rescan or removal.

For maintainers

Badge for the README

If you maintain this skill, this badge shows its score and links to this report. Fix findings and the score moves with the next scan.

[![ProSkills scan 57/100](https://proskills.dev/badge?score=57)](https://proskills.dev/reports/mukul975-analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection)

Same repository

More from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

FAQ

Questions

Is analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection safe to install?: No critical findings, some security notes. The scan covers prompt injection, hidden Unicode, remote code execution and credential access in every text file of the skill. It cannot judge intent, so read any flagged line in context before installing.
How was this score calculated?: Four checks of 25 points each: spec, efficiency, clarity and security. Findings take points off the check they belong to, and any critical finding caps the grade at F. The same scanner runs in your browser at proskills.dev/scan.
Is this report current?: It was made from commit 54a7988 on 2026-10-16. If the skill has changed since, paste the new version into the scanner for a fresh score.
I wrote this skill. Can I fix the score or have the page removed?: Fix the findings and push. The reports are rebuilt from GitHub on a schedule, so the next run picks the change up. To have the page removed, open an issue on the ProSkills GitHub repo.

Keep reading

Free tool

Scan your own skill

Paste a SKILL.md or drop a folder. It is scored in your browser and nothing is uploaded.

Open the Skill Scanner

Want a skill that already passes? Start with a free one.